DistantNews
Support us
🇸🇪 Sweden /Elections & Politics

DN Debate: “Until the Very End, the Government Wants to Restrict Our Rights”

From Dagens Nyheter · () Swedish

Translated from Swedish and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.

At a glance

Opinion Named sources Context piece
  • In an opinion article published before Sweden’s election, freedom-of-expression expert Nils Funcke argues that the Tidö government is restricting free expression and weakening legal protections.
  • Funcke criticizes proposals concerning criminal gangs’ cultural income, public identification of sex offenders and a new freedom-of-expression offense.
  • He says existing rules on violent depictions and incitement could address harmful content without undermining constitutional protections.

With Sweden’s election little more than a week away, the Tidö government is taking what freedom-of-expression expert Nils Funcke calls last-minute steps against legal safeguards and free speech. In a DN Debate article, Funcke accuses ministers of interfering in ongoing court cases and targeting media outlets and journalists who carry out investigations.

He focuses first on a proposal to expand the “red-flagging” of gang criminals and their relatives to include their statements. Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer has said it is unacceptable for criminals to profit from their crimes by producing music, images or books. The Tidö parties want income from such depictions to go to crime victims.

Until the very end, or possibly into the wall, the Tidö government is taking initiatives to restrict freedom of expression, erode legal safeguards and weaken the status of the Freedom of the Press Act and the Fundamental Law on Freedom of Expression as constitutional laws.

· Nils FunckeFuncke opens his opinion article with a broad criticism of the government’s policies.

Funcke argues that courts can already seize income from cultural work to pay damages and fines. Once someone has served a sentence and paid their debts, he says, the state should not impose further confiscation or restrict that person’s freedom of expression. He also criticizes the government’s proposal to make it legal to publicly identify sex offenders, warning that it could encourage vigilante justice and weaken society’s exclusive role in judging and punishing.

The second issue is a government inquiry launched in mid-August, which is expected to propose a new freedom-of-expression offense. Funcke opposes making unlawful invasion of privacy such an offense, noting that the idea was previously examined and rejected by the Freedom of Expression Committee. He argues that the committee’s concerns about an extensive restriction on free speech remain valid, despite the government’s reference to technological developments and the ability to create false material with artificial intelligence.

It is an audacious attack on the free formation of opinion.

· Nils FunckeHe characterizes the government’s treatment of media and journalists.
About this summary

Originally published by Dagens Nyheter in Swedish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.

More Stories

From Our Blog