Ed Miliband Breaks Decades of Foreign Office Inertia Over Illegal Israeli Settlements
Translated from English and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.
At a glance
- The article argues that Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband has moved Britain beyond decades of statements condemning Israeli settlement expansion without concrete action.
- It highlights sanctions and the description of Israelโs actions as ethnic cleansing as evidence of a sharper British response.
- The article recalls criticism from former ministers, including Alan Duncan and Alistair Burt, who said the longstanding policy was weak or ineffective.
For decades, British Foreign Office ministers could issue statements expressing concern about the expansion of illegal Israeli settlements, then stop there. The ritual became so predictable that it invited ridicule.
The article argues that Ed Miliband has finally broken with that pattern. As foreign secretary, he has ended what it describes as Britainโs โfeigned helplessnessโ through sanctions and by describing Israelโs actions as ethnic cleansing.
weak and naive
Even Conservative ministers who once delivered the standard condemnations recognized the gap between language and action. Alan Duncan called Britainโs position on settlements weak and naive. Alistair Burt questioned how the Foreign Office repeatedly found new forms of diplomatic condemnation that never led to a specific measure.
Margaret Thatcher also expressed anger over the settlements. As prime minister, she was often caught between her instinctive sympathy for Israel and concern that Gulf states could fall under Soviet influence. The article presents Milibandโs approach as a departure from that long record of carefully worded protest without meaningful action.
feigned helplessness
Originally published by The Guardian in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.