Editorial: The year 2126 will come anyway

In an era of constant information, discerning reality and future outlooks has become increasingly challenging. The article posits that while staying informed about global and domestic tensions is crucial, the sheer volume of data can be counterproductive, much like an evolutionary instinct to consume all available energy can be detrimental. The primary aim of staying informed should be to enable better, more adequate action, rather than succumbing to hopelessness or deep mental distress.

The human desire to overlook unpleasant or complex issues and seek peace is natural. However, the interconnected nature of global problems, termed a "metacrisis," transcends individual crises and fundamentally challenges the operational methods of modern civilization. Many have not yet updated their approach to this reality, continuing to address crises one at a time, failing to grasp the existential weight of the "total grind."

Discussing the metacrisis places a burden of responsibility on the speaker, as people look for hope or solutions. Awareness of the complexity and irreversibility of some systemic processes can create internal conflict, as one must avoid sowing despair while also refraining from offering false reassurances. The word "crisis" itself can be misleading, implying a temporary state that will eventually pass or be resolved. The article suggests that a more fitting term might be "plinder," a less formal word denoting a tight spot or predicament from which escape may not be possible, but within which one must learn to live. This concept aligns with the individual experience of aging.

Ultimately, worrying about the world should not lead to a loss of joy in life. However, humans are inherently wired to find it difficult to accept a state of "plinder." The article implies that adapting to this complex reality is a significant challenge for individuals and society.