DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง United Kingdom /Technology

Elon Musk's xAI sues Minnesota over AI 'nudification' ban

From The Guardian · () English

Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Sources not specified Context piece
  • xAI, a company founded by Elon Musk, has sued Minnesota over its new law banning "nudification" technology, which uses AI to create fake nude images.
  • The lawsuit argues the law is overly broad and infringes on constitutionally protected speech, potentially penalizing companies with $500,000 fines per violation.
  • Minnesota's attorney general stated that using AI to generate non-consensual nude images is appalling and harms individuals, asserting that AI policy debates should not include such practices.

Elon Musk's artificial intelligence company xAI has filed a lawsuit against Minnesota, challenging the state's pioneering law that prohibits "nudification" technology on websites and apps. This legal challenge could set a precedent for how states regulate the use of artificial intelligence.

The lawsuit, filed in federal court, targets a law set to take effect on Saturday that makes Minnesota the first state to outlaw AI technology capable of generating fake nude images of real people. xAI acknowledges the state's interest in banning the distribution of non-consensual AI-generated nude images. However, the company contends that Minnesota's law "extends far beyond that goal," encompassing constitutionally protected content and exposing the company to penalties of $500,000 for each violation.

But it said Minnesotaโ€™s law โ€œextends far beyond that goalโ€, banning many constitutionally protected images and video and subjecting the company to a penalty of $500,000 for each violation.

โ€” xAIThe lawsuit filed by xAI outlines its objections to the scope and potential penalties of Minnesota's new law.

xAI's legal filing asserts that the law lacks a "safe harbor" provision for companies making good-faith efforts to prevent such images. It also claims the law covers images created with consent or even by the depicted person, and that its definition of "intimate part" is excessively broad, including body parts commonly seen in public. The company's AI model, Grok, is available on the social media platform X, formerly Twitter.

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison stated that while his office had not yet seen the lawsuit, he finds the use of AI to create non-consensual nude images "appalling." He emphasized that AI nudification "robs the target of their dignity and can cause immense harm on an emotional, personal and professional level." Ellison believes that while AI policy debates are important, this specific issue is not one for discussion, suggesting it is unequivocally harmful.

But I know that using AI to generate nude images of people against their will is appalling. There are plenty of worthy debates to have about AI policy. This is not one of them. AI nudification robs the target of their dignity and can cause immense harm on an emotional, personal and professional level.

โ€” Keith EllisonMinnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison commented on the nature and impact of AI-generated non-consensual nude images.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by The Guardian in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.