Ericsson Korea Loses Tax Dispute; Court Rules Software Payments Taxable Royalties
Translated from Korean, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
TLDR
- A South Korean court ruled that software sold by Ericsson's Swedish parent company to its Korean subsidiary constitutes royalty income, not a purchase of goods.
- This means the income is subject to corporate tax in South Korea, even though the parent company has no permanent establishment there.
- Ericsson Korea had argued the payments were for goods, which would be exempt from corporate tax under domestic law for foreign companies without a local presence.
A significant legal battle has concluded with a South Korean court siding with tax authorities, determining that payments made by Ericsson Korea to its Swedish parent, Ericsson AB, for telecommunications software are taxable as royalty income. This ruling has implications for how multinational corporations structure their inter-company transactions and manage their tax liabilities within South Korea.
Ericsson Korea had contended that the software payments were akin to purchasing goods, a transaction that, under South Korean law, is not subject to corporate tax if the seller (Ericsson AB) lacks a permanent establishment in the country. However, the court's decision, affirming the tax authority's stance, classified these payments as 'royalty income' derived from the use of know-how and technology. This distinction is crucial, as royalty income from foreign entities is taxable in South Korea.
The court's reasoning highlighted the substantial investment in research and development, the specialized nature of the technology, and the fact that the hardware is inoperable without the software. These factors led the judges to conclude that the software represented accumulated expertise and technology rather than a simple commodity. This verdict reinforces South Korea's position in taxing income generated within its borders, particularly concerning intellectual property and technological services, ensuring a fairer tax base and preventing potential tax avoidance by foreign firms.
The introduction of the software in this case was not the import of goods, but the introduction of know-how or technology. It is reasonable to consider the income in this case as royalty income, which is income sourced within South Korea for a foreign corporation.
Originally published by Hankyoreh in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.