DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ณ Honduras /Economy & Trade

EU court questions some FIFA agent rules

From Proceso Digital · () Spanish

Translated from Spanish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Sources not specified Context piece
  • The European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled that some FIFA agent regulations conflict with EU competition law.
  • The court found that certain rules may hinder the free provision of services, leaving national courts to decide individual cases.
  • The ruling stems from a German lawsuit by two football agents challenging FIFA's regulations on representation limits, remuneration, and licensing.

The European Court of Justice has cast doubt on several FIFA regulations concerning football agents, deeming some incompatible with EU competition law and others potentially obstructing the free provision of services. The Luxembourg-based court's decision, prompted by a lawsuit from two player agents in Germany, addresses rules that limit agent remuneration, restrict simultaneous representation of multiple parties in a transfer, and govern licensing requirements.

Specifically, the ECJ found a rule prohibiting agents from contacting or signing a client already under an exclusive representation contract, except within a two-month window before its expiration, to be incompatible with European legislation against collusive practices. The court argued this rule grants an undue advantage to agents already bound by exclusive contracts, allowing them to renegotiate terms or sign new deals outside the specified period.

Regarding abuse of a dominant position, the ECJ acknowledged FIFA's dominant role in the international transfer market for professional players and coaches. However, it deferred to national courts the decision on whether specific rules constitute an abuse of this dominance and if such behavior can be justified. The court also indicated that certain regulations, including those on multiple representation, licensing, and agent "contacts," could impede the freedom to provide services. The extent to which these rules restrict this freedom, particularly if they deter agents from operating in other EU states, will also be assessed by national courts.

by which they are conferred an undue advantage

โ€” European Court of JusticeThe court argued that the prohibition on agents already bound by exclusive contracts allows them to renegotiate terms or sign new deals outside the specified period, 'by which they are conferred an undue advantage.'
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Proceso Digital in Spanish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.