EU's equal pay directive faces backlash as 'bureaucratic monster'
Translated from Swedish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- The EU's new equal pay directive, intended to ensure equal pay for equal work and stop secret pay scales, has faced strong opposition.
- Critics label the rules a "bureaucratic monster," and Sweden's government voted against it in 2023, citing administrative burdens.
- Despite resistance from some member states and employer organizations, the European Commission, led by Ursula von der Leyen, insists on implementing the directive.
Brussels' push for equal pay between men and women through a new EU directive has ignited a fierce debate, with critics decrying the legislation as an "administrative monster." The directive aims to enforce equal pay for equal work and dismantle secret pay scales, ensuring women are not underpaid compared to male colleagues for the same job.
Intended to be implemented by member states by early June, the directive has met significant resistance. Sweden's government voted against it in 2023, arguing that compliance would be too "administratively burdensome" and distract from other gender equality efforts. Employer organizations like SKR and Svenskt Nรคringsliv echo these concerns, believing existing Swedish pay-mapping requirements are sufficient.
In Germany, the directive's complex name alone is cited as a bureaucratic hurdle. However, European trade unions largely support the EU's initiative, welcoming measures to combat pay discrimination and secret salary lists. Despite calls for renegotiation from the Swedish government, the EU Commission, under President Ursula von der Leyen, has firmly rejected softening the requirements. Von der Leyen considers it unacceptable that women in the EU earn, on average, 11% less per hour than men and is committed to ensuring fair treatment.
Women must know if their employers are treating them fairly. And when that is not the case...
Originally published by Dagens Nyheter in Swedish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.