"Euphoria" Finale: As Bad as "Game of Thrones"?
Translated from German, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- The finale of the HBO series "Euphoria" has drawn mixed reactions from viewers and critics.
- Some praised the ending for its dignified conclusion to the story of drug-addicted teenagers, while others deemed it the worst finale since "Game of Thrones."
- Film scholar Andrea Braidt partially agrees with the criticism, noting that while the third season was disappointing, it still contained great scenes.
The finale of HBO's "Euphoria" has sparked a debate among viewers and critics, with opinions sharply divided on its quality. While some found the conclusion to the series about drug-addicted teenagers to be fitting and dignified, a significant portion of the audience has delivered a scathing verdict, comparing it unfavorably to the "Game of Thrones" finale.
Film scholar Andrea Braidt acknowledges some of the criticism, suggesting that while the third season was disappointing overall, it did feature some standout moments. This nuanced perspective highlights the complex reception of the finale, which has left many fans questioning the direction and execution of the series' conclusion.
The finale of "Euphoria" was in many parts an annoyance โ but not entirely.
The series, which stars Zendaya, Sydney Sweeney, Jacob Elordi, and Hunter Schafer, has been known for its intense portrayal of adolescent struggles. The mixed reactions to its finale suggest that the show's ambitious storytelling may not have satisfied all viewers, leading to a polarized discussion about its legacy.
Zendaya, Sydney Sweeney, Jacob Elordi, Hunter Schafer & Co. would have offered the worst finale since Game of Thrones.
Originally published by Der Standard in German. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.