Ex-ASIO Agent Offers Overseas Evidence for Bondi Attack Inquiry
Translated from English and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.
At a glance
- A former ASIO agent, identified as Marcus, claims he warned the agency about the Bondi attackers years prior to the incident.
- Marcus is willing to provide evidence to a royal commission from overseas, as his visa applications to return to Australia have been rejected.
- The royal commission has been in contact with Marcus's solicitors and is working on arrangements for him to give testimony remotely.
A former Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) agent, known only as Marcus, has offered to provide evidence from overseas to the royal commission investigating the Bondi terror attack. Marcus claims he alerted ASIO to the individuals involved in the attack years before it occurred, alleging that the incident was a consequence of "a set of errors and a disregard for information."
Marcus, who previously worked with ASIO to infiltrate Islamic State networks in Western Sydney, stated that the agency was warned about Naveed and Sajid Akram in 2019. ASIO has previously defended its assessments at the time, labeling Marcus as "disgruntled and unreliable," a characterization he rejects.
Living abroad, Marcus has twice had visa applications to return to Australia rejected, with immigration authorities unconvinced of his temporary stay intentions. He had previously sought protection and resettlement in Australia. The sensitivity of his evidence and the legal protections afforded on Australian soil were cited as reasons for his desire to testify in person.
Commissioner Virginia Bell SC noted the efforts made to secure Marcus's testimony, including contact with his solicitors and collaboration with the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) to arrange a remote testimony. While Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke had previously stated Marcus was free to give evidence publicly, the royal commission will not hear his testimony in open hearings due to the risk of prejudicing separate criminal proceedings. The commission has stated it has yet to receive Marcus's testimony, despite proposals for a call with Counsel Assisting.
was a result of a set of errors and a disregard for information.
Originally published by ABC Australia in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.