Ex-Egypt player: 'We played against Messi, Argentina, the referee, and FIFA'
Translated from Spanish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Former Egyptian player Mohamed Aboutrika accused the referee and FIFA of bias after Egypt's World Cup elimination.
- Aboutrika claimed Argentina's goals were unfairly awarded and Egypt's disallowed goal should have stood.
- He stated the team felt they were playing against Messi, Argentina, the referee, and FIFA.
Former Egyptian national team player Mohamed Aboutrika leveled strong accusations following Egypt's dramatic 3-2 defeat to Argentina in the 2026 World Cup round of 16. Aboutrika alleged that the referee was unfair and that Egypt was disadvantaged at crucial moments.
According to reports, Aboutrika stated that the referee's decisions were influenced by the pressure of playing against Argentina. He specifically pointed to the third goal scored by Argentina, which he believes should have been disallowed due to a penalty not called on Mohamed Salah. Conversely, he argued that Egypt's disallowed goal should have been allowed, citing a foul against Lisandro Martรญnez.
The referee of the match was not fair to us and we were harmed. Argentina's third goal should have been disallowed for a penalty against Mohamed Salah, just as our goal was disallowed after a foul against Lisandro Martรญnez.
Aboutrika's comments suggest a feeling of playing against more than just the opposing team. "We played against Messi, Argentina, the referee, and FIFA," he reportedly said, indicating a perception of systemic bias affecting the match outcome.
The referee was influenced by the pressure of Argentina and that feeling was noticeable among the players. Thus, we played against Messi, Argentina, the referee, and FIFA.
Originally published by Cooperativa in Spanish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.