DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Nigeria /Crime & Justice

Fake agency: Disagreements stall Reps panel report

From The Punch · () English

Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Ongoing story
  • Disagreements among members of a Nigerian House of Representatives ad hoc committee have delayed the final report on a purported Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council.
  • The committee questioned government officials and individuals involved in the alleged recognition of the fictitious agency, which included allegations of bribery against the President's Chief of Staff.
  • Key issues causing the delay include disputes over whether to formally invite the Chief of Staff to testify and the location of testimony from the alleged head of the fake agency.

A Nigerian House of Representatives committee investigating a purported Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council is facing internal disagreements, delaying its final report. The ad hoc panel, chaired by Yusuf Gagdi, has been deliberating for over a month.

The committee questioned senior government officials, including the Head of the Civil Service, officials from the Central Bank of Nigeria, the Budget Office, and the Accountant-General's office. These officials stated they acted based on information provided by Adeniyi Adeyemi, who presented himself as the agency's Director-General. Adeyemi had previously alleged paying N400 million to the Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, through a proxy for his appointment, though he later clarified he never met Gbajabiamila personally. The Presidency and Gbajabiamila have denied the allegations, labeling the agency fictitious and Adeyemi a forger. An investigation by the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission cleared the Presidency and recommended Adeyemi's prosecution.

Disagreements within the 12-member committee are reportedly hindering the report's conclusion. Some members believe Gbajabiamila should be formally invited to respond to the allegations. Another point of contention is Adeyemi's insistence on testifying publicly with his legal team present, a demand that has reportedly caused difficulties. A source privy to the proceedings, speaking anonymously, indicated these disputes are contributing to the delay.

Some of the committee members feel there should have been a presentation from Gbajabiamila since Adeyemi is alleged to have mentioned his name in the saga.

โ€” Source familiar with the proceedingsDescribing the disagreements within the House committee.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by The Punch. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.