Family challenges train conductor's 10-year sentence, citing lack of homicide consideration
Translated from German, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- A lawyer representing the family of a slain train conductor is challenging a court's verdict and sentence of 10 years for bodily harm resulting in death.
- The family's legal team argues the court failed to consider intent to kill, stating the conductor was beaten and killed during a ticket inspection.
- The family seeks a clear signal against escalating violence towards public transport workers, not just a harsher sentence.
The family of a train conductor, killed five months ago during a ticket inspection, is demanding a review of a 10-year sentence for bodily harm resulting in death. Their lawyer, Yalcin Tekinoglu, called the verdict a "slap in the face" for victims' families and public transport workers who face daily danger.
The verdict is another slap in the face for the relatives and for all people who work for the common good and put themselves in danger every day.
Tekinoglu stated the court's failure to consider intent to kill was a critical error. He described how the conductor was "beaten and killed with at least four blows" during the February incident. The family boycotted the sentencing, believing the court should have at least explored the possibility of a homicide charge.
The train conductor was beaten and killed with at least four blows during the ticket control at the beginning of February.
The family's primary goal is not solely a higher sentence, but to send a strong message against the rising violence targeting public transport employees. They want to ensure no one fears severe violence while commuting or performing their jobs. The defense team is also considering an appeal, with lawyer Dimitrios Giannadakis stating they need to consult their client.
We will check, we have to talk to him again.
Originally published by Die Zeit in German. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.