FIFA's new rules cause division: 'This kills the game's rhythm'

FIFA's introduction of mandatory three-minute hydration breaks during World Cup matches has sparked debate among players and coaches, with opinions sharply divided on their impact on the game. While some players find the interruptions disrupt the flow and rhythm of play, coaches often view them as valuable tactical opportunities.

Dutch captain Virgil van Dijk expressed his reservations, stating, "I think the hydration breaks are a bit interesting because I've obviously watched almost all the games. I don't really like the TV commercials." He added, "I don't think it's great for neutral viewers on TV either. So, if it's really hot, obviously it's good to put them in. But I think you have to look at it separately in each game, in my opinion."

“

I think the hydration breaks are a bit interesting because I've obviously watched almost all the games. I don't really like the TV commercials. I don't think it's great for neutral viewers on TV either. So, if it's really hot, obviously it's good to put them in. But I think you have to look at it separately in each game, in my opinion.

The breaks, implemented around the 22nd minute of each half, are intended to address concerns about high temperatures and humidity, particularly after last year's FIFA Club World Cup in the United States. However, the rule applies to all matches for fairness and consistency, even when the weather is not excessively hot.

“

As a player, it can work both ways. In some cities it's not that hot and maybe we shouldn't do it. But at the end of the day, if you do it in some cities, you should do it for everyone.

Belgian player Youri Tielemans acknowledged the inconsistency, noting, "As a player, it can work both ways. In some cities it's not that hot and maybe we shouldn't do it. But at the end of the day, if you do it in some cities, you should do it for everyone." Coaches, however, often welcome the pause. Belgian coach Rudi Garcia commented, "For me, this is more a break for coaches than a break to cool down, so it's very important to me." He explained that the break can be useful for giving tactical information to the team, especially if the team is in a good moment or has momentum.

Broadcasters are permitted to show ads during the hydration breaks but must return to live coverage 30 seconds before play resumes. Some broadcasters, however, have opted not to show ads to preserve the integrity of the live match. Critics argue that the breaks can negatively affect teams by interrupting their momentum. A notable instance cited is when Curacao equalized against Germany in the 21st minute, only for a hydration break to be called shortly after, allowing Germany to regroup and ultimately win 7-1.

“

For me, this is more a break for coaches than a break to cool down, so it's very important to me. Maybe if we are in a good moment, in good momentum, maybe it can be interrupted by a break. But during the two friendly matches we played, it was interesting to give some tactical information to the team. For me it is