Forced contraception in Greenland did not meet legal definition of genocide, experts say
Translated from Slovak and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.
At a glance
- Experts argue that Denmark's forced contraception campaign in Greenland did not meet the legal definition of genocide.
- The campaign, which involved the forced sterilization and IUD insertions of Inuit women, violated their rights.
- The findings highlight a historical injustice and the violation of reproductive rights.
Experts have concluded that Denmark's campaign of forced contraception in Greenland, which involved the sterilization and IUD insertions of Inuit women, did not meet the legal definition of genocide. However, they affirmed that the campaign constituted a severe violation of women's rights.
The findings address a historical practice where Danish authorities implemented a policy of forced birth control on Inuit women in Greenland during the 1960s and 1970s. This policy aimed to reduce the population, and many women were fitted with IUDs or underwent sterilization without their full consent or understanding.
While the legal threshold for genocide, which requires intent to destroy a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group, was not met according to the experts' assessment, the campaign is recognized as a profound breach of fundamental human rights and reproductive autonomy. The revelations have brought renewed attention to the historical injustices faced by the Inuit population in Greenland under Danish rule.
Originally published by SME in Slovak. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.
Image: Evgeniy Maloletka, TASR, AP