DistantNews
Support us

Forever wars: Israel’s cycle of conflict shows no finish line

From Al Jazeera · () English

Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Outcome reported
  • Israelis overwhelmingly feel the US deal with Iran signals a loss of their victory, with 92% polled expressing this sentiment.
  • Many Israelis believe the country should continue its military actions against Iran and Hezbollah, regardless of US urgings.
  • The article frames Israel's ongoing conflicts as a cycle with no clear end, linking them to historical trauma and identity.
  • It highlights internal Israeli political consensus on war, despite disagreements on prosecution, and criticizes the US decision to make a deal with Tehran.

A significant majority of Israelis, 92 percent, believe the recent memorandum of understanding between Tehran and Washington signifies a surrender of their hard-won victory over a long-standing adversary. This sentiment is so strong that nearly half of those polled indicated Israel should press on with its attacks against Lebanon and the pro-Iran group Hezbollah, irrespective of directives from its primary ally and sponsor, the United States.

According to a recent poll, an overwhelming 92 percent of Israelis felt the US has signed away their victory over a decades-old enemy, with almost half of those polled saying Israel should continue its attacks on Lebanon and the pro-Iran group Hezbollah, irrespective of the urgings of Washington, its principal ally and sponsor.

— N/AReporting on Israeli public sentiment following the US-Iran agreement.

Israel has been engaged in continuous regional conflicts since the Hamas-led attack on October 7, 2023. These actions include a genocide in Gaza, significant attacks on Iran, clashes with Hezbollah in Lebanon, incursions into Syria, and strikes against the Houthis in Yemen. Within Israel's divided parliament, support for these wars represents a rare point of consensus, even as individual politicians debate the methods of their execution.

the unprovoked attacks on Tehran as “the most just war in recent decades against the most bitter enemy”.

— Gadi EisenkotDescribing the joint US-Israeli strikes on Iran.

Former Israeli chief of staff Gadi Eisenkot, a potential successor to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, described the joint US-Israeli strikes on Iran as "the most just war in recent decades against the most bitter enemy." Opposition leader Yair Lapid echoed this support, expressing outrage over Washington's deal with Tehran, which he deemed "one of the most shocking failures of Israel's foreign and security policy, entirely on Netanyahu's account."

one of the most shocking failures of Israel’s foreign and security policy, and it is entirely on Netanyahu’s account.

— Yair LapidReacting to Washington's decision to make a deal with Tehran.

Sociologist Daniel Bar-Tal from Tel Aviv University suggests this widespread Israeli reaction is rooted in a political, media, and societal process that connects the 2023 Hamas attack to the Holocaust, a central element of Israeli identity. Consequently, the attack is framed not just as a horrific event but as the latest installment in a long history of Jewish trauma. Bar-Tal notes that this framing is reinforced by the "justness of the national goals, glorification of the Jewish nation, [and] sense of collective victimhood," alongside the "delegitimisation of Palestinian rights."

merely as a horrific event in its own right, but as the latest chapter in a much older story of Jewish historical trauma

— Daniel Bar-TalExplaining how the Hamas attack is framed within Israeli identity and historical context.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Al Jazeera. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.