FRSC denies harassment claims in Abuja traffic operation

The Federal Road Safety Corps (FRSC) has issued a strong rebuttal to circulating social media allegations of harassment and assault during a recent traffic enforcement operation in Abuja. The Corps insists that its officers conducted themselves professionally and adhered to standard procedures while addressing traffic violations.

“

The Federal Road Safety Corps wishes to address the trending video and public concerns regarding an incident involving its patrol team… Contrary to the misleading narrative being circulated, the incident arose during a routine traffic enforcement operation.

The controversy erupted following a viral video that purportedly showed FRSC officials engaging in abusive behavior, including claims that a man was struck with an iron rod. This narrative sparked public outrage and raised concerns about alleged abuses of power by traffic enforcement officers. However, the FRSC maintains that the video and accompanying claims present a misleading picture of the events.

According to the FRSC's statement, the incident occurred on Thursday, April 16, 2026, during a routine enforcement exercise by the Central Business District Unit Command. Officers lawfully intercepted a vehicle for identifiable traffic violations, such as overloading and failure to use seatbelts. The situation reportedly escalated when the driver became non-compliant with lawful directives, attracting a crowd and increasing tension.

“

The vehicle was lawfully intercepted for identifiable traffic violations, including overloading and seatbelt non-compliance. In line with standard procedures, appropriate steps were taken to enforce compliance.

The Corps categorically denied any wrongdoing by its personnel, stating that no FRSC officer assaulted, threatened, or attempted to use force against the driver or any occupants. Furthermore, the FRSC clarified that an individual seen holding an iron rod in the video was a passerby whose actions were misinterpreted and had no connection to the FRSC or the driver involved. The Corps emphasized that its officers de-escalated the situation by disengaging from the scene to prevent further tension.

“

During the course of the operation, the driver became non-compliant and diverted from lawful directives, creating a scene that attracted public attention and increased tension within the area.

This clarification from the FRSC aims to address public concerns and correct what it describes as a misleading narrative. The incident underscores the challenges faced by law enforcement agencies in balancing enforcement duties with public perception, especially in the age of social media where videos can quickly go viral and shape public opinion.

“

It is important to categorically state that at no time did any FRSC personnel assault, threaten, or attempt to use force against the driver or any occupant of the vehicle.