DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Nigeria /Crime & Justice

Gaslighting as State Policy: Columnist Links Legal Tactics to Denial and Blame Shifting

From ThisDay · () English

Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

Opinion Sources not specified Context piece
  • The article defines and explains 'gaslighting' as a form of manipulation and denial, extending its use from domestic settings to public governance.
  • It draws parallels between gaslighting tactics and those potentially used in litigation, citing a case involving the death of Chimamanda Adichie's son.
  • The author suggests that in the legal context, gaslighting can involve deflecting from serious issues like evidence destruction by shifting blame or questioning credibility.

Gaslighting, a term often associated with domestic emotional abuse, is increasingly prevalent in public life and governance, according to columnist Onikepo Braithwaite. She defines it as a form of manipulation involving falsehoods, denial, trivialization, or outright lies by one party to mislead another. The manipulator, or 'Blamer,' unfairly shifts blame to the other party, the 'Blamee,' causing them to question their own perception of reality, facts, or even their sanity.

Braithwaite illustrates this with a domestic example: a husband who denies drinking despite his wife's suspicions, making her doubt her senses and accuse her of paranoia. This denial, coupled with attacks on her credibility, serves to deflect blame from himself. The columnist argues that similar tactics, ironically, may be employed within the legal profession, particularly in litigation where parties often hold polarized positions.

The article points to a recent case involving the death of author Chimamanda Adichie's son, Nkanu. The family's counsel reportedly stated, "He who is innocent, does not fear an open inquest." Braithwaite suggests this statement, while seemingly true, smacks of gaslighting. She posits that the counsel, as the 'Blamer,' weaponized public sympathy to potentially deflect from evidentiary weaknesses. The 'Blamee,' Euracare's Counsel, could have responded by highlighting the destruction of evidence, arguing that innocence should not fear an inquest that involves such actions.

Ultimately, Braithwaite contends that this alleged gaslighting deflects from the seriousness of cremating or destroying evidence, which is criminalized under the Coronersโ€™ System Law of Lagos State. This destruction of evidence forms the basis of the application for judicial review, suggesting a deliberate attempt to obscure the truth through manipulative tactics rather than addressing the core legal issues.

He who is innocent, does not fear an open inquest

โ€” Adichie-Esege Family CounselThe counsel's statement in the case of Chimamanda Adichie's son's death, which the author suggests resembles gaslighting.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by ThisDay in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.