Geneva’s Political Debate Turns Again to Roma Presence in Public Spaces
Translated from French and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.
At a glance
- Geneva lawmakers are preparing to debate the presence of Roma people, begging and temporary camps in the city’s public spaces.
- The issue has returned after courts dealt two major setbacks to laws targeting begging, while residents report greater visibility of mattresses and makeshift camps.
- City security official Marie Barbey-Chappuis said in mid-August that the situation was close to being out of control and cited the removal of 13 tonnes of mattresses, blankets and waste.
The names may largely go unspoken in Geneva’s parliament this week, under the stated concern that no particular community should be discriminated against. But the debate is once again about Roma people and their presence in the city’s public spaces.
The issue has occupied Geneva politics for two decades, traditionally through arguments over begging. After two major defeats in court, the cantonal right is preparing to continue the fight under a different heading: the occupation and sanitation of public space.
The subject has repeatedly returned to parliament. According to the Politiveille monitoring tool, about 15 parliamentary items focused on begging in the city center over the past five years alone. Residents are now increasingly concerned about mattresses and temporary camps becoming more visible in their daily surroundings.
In mid-August, Marie Barbey-Chappuis, the City of Geneva’s administrative councillor responsible for security, described the situation as “not far from being out of control.” She pointed to the removal of 13 tonnes of mattresses, blankets and waste, and accused the canton of leaving municipalities to deal with the problem on their own.
not far from being out of control
Originally published by Le Temps in French. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.