DistantNews
Support us
Germany's Border Controls Face Calls for Abolition Amidst Growing Criticism
๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ท Croatia /Economy & Trade

Germany's Border Controls Face Calls for Abolition Amidst Growing Criticism

From Veฤernji List · () Croatian

Translated from Croatian, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Sources not specified New plan
  • Former SPD leader Martin Schulz urged Germany to abolish border controls, citing unnecessary traffic jams and financial losses.
  • European Commissioner for Migration Magnus Brunner also called for gradual abolition, stating conditions are met due to fewer migrants and new asylum rules.
  • Germany introduced border checks in September 2024, which Schulz claims are symbolic and ineffective, with potential legal challenges ahead.

Former SPD leader Martin Schulz has called on Germany to end its border controls, arguing they cause significant traffic congestion and financial losses, particularly for cross-border commuters and transporters. He warned that public dissatisfaction could escalate during the summer holidays as travelers face lengthy waits.

But I believe that when many people go on vacation, and then find themselves in queues when they return to Germany, dissatisfaction will grow. Already, in some places, people are waiting up to an hour.

โ€” Martin SchulzFormer SPD leader Martin Schulz on the growing public dissatisfaction with border delays during peak travel times.

European Commissioner for Migration Magnus Brunner echoed this sentiment, noting that reduced migrant numbers and updated asylum regulations now permit the gradual removal of internal EU border checks. Germany implemented these controls on all land borders in September 2024, leading to multi-kilometer queues at some crossings with the Netherlands.

These stationary controls are purely symbolic politics.

โ€” Martin SchulzMartin Schulz's assessment of the effectiveness of Germany's current border control measures.

Schulz dismissed the stationary checks as "purely symbolic politics," suggesting that smugglers and individuals would simply find alternative routes. He supports occasional checks but not permanent ones, as they fail to achieve their intended goals. Furthermore, Schulz highlighted that persistent border controls might contravene the Schengen Agreement, anticipating that courts will ultimately rule on their legality. This stance is partly supported by a recent administrative court ruling in Koblenz that favored a law professor challenging a stop at the German-Luxembourg border, though the Interior Minister has appealed the decision.

People and drug smugglers will simply choose other routes.

โ€” Martin SchulzSchulz's argument that permanent border controls do not deter illicit activities.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Veฤernji List in Croatian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.