Green MP's claim English is a 'bastard language' is broadly correct, but speech had errors: Professor
Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Green Party MP Tamatha Paul's assertion that English is a "bastardisation" of other languages is largely accurate, according to Professor Paul Moon.
- Moon, a history professor at Auckland University of Technology, noted that while Paul's core claim is correct, her speech in Parliament contained factual errors.
- The article does not specify the errors or provide further details on Paul's speech beyond the "bastardisation" claim.
Green Party MP Tamatha Paul recently drew attention for her speech in Parliament, where she described the English language as a "bastardisation" of other languages. Professor Paul Moon, a historian at Auckland University of Technology, has stated that Paul's assertion is broadly correct, acknowledging the linguistic origins of English as a hybrid language.
Professor Moon, who has taught at AUT since 1993 and worked on Waitangi Tribunal claims, supports the view that English has evolved through the amalgamation of various linguistic influences. This perspective highlights the historical development of English, incorporating elements from Germanic, Latin, French, and other languages over centuries.
However, Professor Moon also pointed out that while Paul's central argument about the nature of English holds merit, her parliamentary speech contained factual errors. The article does not elaborate on the specific inaccuracies within Paul's address, focusing instead on the validation of her core linguistic claim by the history professor.
Green MP for Wellington Central Tamatha Paul.
Originally published by NZ Herald in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.