DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Israel /Conflict & Security

Gulf allies grow frustrated with Trump's Iran policy, seek new security arrangements

From Jerusalem Post · () English

Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Context piece
  • US-allied Gulf states, including Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, Kuwait, and Bahrain, are increasingly frustrated with President Trump's approach to Iran.
  • These nations reportedly question the utility of hosting US military bases and are exploring new security arrangements.
  • Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Pakistan recently formed a NATO-like defense pact, signaling a diversification of security partnerships.

US-allied Gulf states are growing increasingly frustrated with President Donald Trump's handling of Iran, with some reportedly questioning the value of hosting U.S. military bases and exploring alternative security arrangements. The Washington Post reported, citing Arab and Western officials, that governments in Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Kuwait, and Bahrain share this frustration, with one official stating that anger towards the U.S. has reached its highest point since the war with Iran began in February.

Trump started this war, and we are paying the price.

โ€” A Gulf state officialThe official expressed frustration with the U.S. president's role in the conflict with Iran.

"Trump started this war," the official told the newspaper, "and we are paying the price." While the U.S. remains a close security partner and arms supplier, the region's governments are beginning to doubt the effectiveness of continuing to host American military installations.

This growing discontent is underscored by the recent formation of a NATO-like alliance between Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Pakistan, known as the Mecca Joint Defense Agreement. This pact, signed in early August after months of Iranian attacks on Gulf countries, stipulates that an attack on one member will be considered an attack on all. A European official described the agreement as a "signal to the US" that some regional states are seeking to diversify their security and defense partnerships because "the US is not enough."

In their mind, the US is not enough.

โ€” A European officialThe official commented on the implications of the new defense pact between Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Pakistan.

However, one Western diplomat familiar with the region offered a different perspective, suggesting that U.S. military forces were not enthusiastically welcomed even before the war. "It was more something that was a necessary evil," the diplomat told the Washington Post. "Now, the necessity of it is being put in question."

It was more something that was a necessary evil. Now, the necessity of it is being put in question.

โ€” A Western diplomatThe diplomat shared their view on the region's evolving relationship with U.S. military presence.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Jerusalem Post in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.