H-1B visa holders lose 60-day grace period as White House office approves plan

A key approval has been granted by a White House office for a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) plan to eliminate the 60-day grace period for H-1B visa holders in the United States. This change means H-1B visa holders will no longer have a buffer period to find new employment or adjust their status if they lose their jobs.

Historically, the 60-day grace period provided H-1B visa holders with crucial time to seek alternative employment, switch to a tourist visa, or change their status to H4 (for spouses) or F1 (for students). The Trump administration had previously signaled an intention to remove this grace period, and the proposal has now cleared review at the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs.

“

It pushes them further into indentured servitude and gives unscrupulous employers even more leverage. It widens wage disparities, suppresses bargaining power, and hurts both H-1B and American workers. And Big Tech won't lobby against it; only strengthens their leverage.

Indian-American entrepreneur Vivek Wadhwa described the situation as "the scariest possible" for H-1B workers. He argued that eliminating the grace period "pushes them further into indentured servitude and gives unscrupulous employers even more leverage." Wadhwa also predicted that "Big Tech won't lobby against it; only strengthens their leverage," potentially widening wage gaps and suppressing bargaining power for both H-1B and American workers.

“

This proposed rule will make the H-1B visa more like indentured servitude because job changes will become more difficult. This undercuts the administration's stated goal of helping put Americans on a level playing field with foreign workers. Companies will prefer H-1B even more.

Immigration researcher Daniel Di Martino echoed these concerns, stating that the rule will make H-1B visas "more like indentured servitude because job changes will become more difficult." He believes this move contradicts the administration's stated goal of creating a level playing field for American workers and will likely lead companies to favor H-1B employees even more.

Immigration attorney Steven Brown suggested the regulation could face legal challenges. He also noted that those who criticize the H-1B program for allegedly allowing workers to accept unfavorable conditions should oppose this regulation. Brown emphasized that a "small off ramp" not only aligns with the ideals of the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act (AC21) but also provides essential flexibility and safeguards for employees.

“

Not only do I personally think this will run into some legal hurdles, but all the people that complain about the H-1B program because “workers are much more willing to put up with whatever or have to leave” should be opposed to this regulation. Having a small off ramp not only comports with the ideals of AC21, it also allows employees flexibility and safeguards that protect them.