DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Israel /Elections & Politics

Hamas must be banned from Palestinian Authority elections - comment

From Jerusalem Post · () English

Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

Opinion Named sources Context piece
  • The article argues against allowing Hamas to participate in Palestinian legislative elections, citing the 2006 outcome.
  • In 2006, Hamas won a majority of seats after the US pushed for elections under its "freedom agenda," despite Israel's objections.
  • The author contends that Hamas's participation led to violence and the takeover of Gaza, suggesting a different outcome might have occurred if they had been excluded.

The author argues that Hamas should be banned from participating in the upcoming Palestinian legislative elections, scheduled for November 28, warning that allowing their involvement risks repeating the "ugly, murder-strewn history" of 2006.

In 2006, the US, under its "freedom agenda," encouraged democratic elections across the Middle East, believing they would foster stability. Then-National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley stated, "Only when Palestinians are able freely to express themselves through ballots rather than bombs will we be able to get on the road to security for Israel." Despite Israel's concerns that an armed group committed to its destruction should not participate in democratic politics, the US did not insist Hamas resolve this contradiction beforehand.

Hamas ran under the party name "Change and Reform" and secured a majority of seats in the Palestinian Legislative Council, winning 74 out of 132 seats compared to Fatah's 45. This result surprised many, including Washington, with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice later acknowledging the US had failed to anticipate the magnitude of Hamas's victory.

The author contends that this outcome had severe consequences. Just over a year later, in June 2007, Hamas violently expelled Fatah and the Palestinian Authority from Gaza, transforming the territory into a base for launching rockets and invasions. The article suggests that the US's "innocent naivete" in not foreseeing that a group aiming to replace Israel might prevail at the ballot box led to this outcome, a naivete the author claims persists today.

Only when Palestinians are able freely to express themselves through ballots rather than bombs will we be able to get on the road to security for Israel.

โ€” Stephen HadleyFormer US National Security Adviser's statement in October 2005 regarding the belief that democratic elections would lead to security.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Jerusalem Post. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.