Hamilton and Ferrari dominate Monaco Grand Prix practice
Translated from Spanish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Lewis Hamilton dominated the practice sessions for the Monaco Grand Prix, with teammate Charles Leclerc second.
- Hamilton, a seven-time world champion, is seeking his fourth win in Monaco and aims to match Ayrton Senna's podium record.
- Max Verstappen was third fastest, while McLaren's Lando Norris faced a battery issue, and Aston Martin had a difficult session.
Seven-time world champion Lewis Hamilton set the pace in practice for the Monaco Grand Prix, topping the second session ahead of Ferrari teammate Charles Leclerc. Hamilton, who has won in the principality three times, posted a best lap of 1:13.026, narrowly beating the Monegasque driver by 0.111 seconds. This strong performance follows his second-place finish in Canada and suggests a potential resurgence for the British driver as he pursues his 105th pole position and 106th career victory.
Hamilton's last victory in Monaco was in 2019, with previous wins in 2008 and 2016. He is one of six current drivers to have won on the iconic street circuit. Red Bull's Max Verstappen secured the third fastest time, trailing Hamilton by 0.168 seconds, ahead of the Mercedes duo of George Russell and rookie Kimi Antonelli. If Hamilton finishes on the podium on Sunday, he will equal the record of eight podiums in Monaco held by the legendary Ayrton Senna.
Other notable performances included Isack Hadjar (Red Bull) recovering from an earlier crash to finish sixth. However, McLaren's Lando Norris encountered a battery failure, limiting him to 19th place. The Audi cars of Nico Hulkenberg and Gabriel Bortoleto finished eighth and ninth, respectively, with Oliver Bearman rounding out the top 10 for Haas. The Aston Martin team endured a challenging day, with Fernando Alonso qualifying 20th and Lance Stroll 22nd.
Originally published by El Nacional in Spanish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.