DistantNews
Support us

Hawks turn against Trump as peace deal with Iran draws criticism

From Svenska Dagbladet · () Swedish

Translated from Swedish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

Analysis Sources not specified Context piece
  • Commentator Göran Eriksson notes a shift in Republican foreign policy hawks' stance on Donald Trump's actions regarding Iran.
  • Initially, hawks like Senator Lindsey Graham supported Trump's military action against Iran, while figures like Tucker Carlson criticized it.
  • Three months later, the same hawks are expressing disappointment and criticism over a peace deal, feeling betrayed by Trump's administration.

Commentator Göran Eriksson observes a significant shift among Republican foreign policy hawks regarding Donald Trump's approach to Iran. Initially, hawks, who traditionally advocate for military intervention to protect American interests, found themselves at odds with Trump's "America First" rhetoric when he launched military action against Iran.

Sure, I've been called a lot worse than that. And yes, I'm definitely a guy who wants to hit them before they hit you.

— Lindsey GrahamSenator Lindsey Graham's response when asked if he could be described as a 'happy hawk' after the war in Iran began.

Figures like Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly, formerly of Fox News, publicly denounced the war as "evil" and "the dumbest thing any American president has ever done." However, hawks such as Senator Lindsey Graham, whom Eriksson met in Washington, initially celebrated the military action. Graham, a proponent of a strong stance against adversaries, famously stated, "We're going to blow these people to hell. This regime is in its death throes right now, it's going to be forced to its knees." He dismissed cost concerns, comparing the situation to World War II.

We're going to blow these people to hell. This regime is in its death throes right now, it's going to be forced to its knees.

— Lindsey GrahamLindsey Graham speaking to Fox News about the Iranian regime.

Months later, the dynamic has reversed. The same hawks now feel betrayed by Trump's administration's pursuit of a peace deal. Senator Ted Cruz criticized the deal, calling it "history teaches us that it is not a good idea to give billions of dollars to theocratic lunatics who want to murder us." Media personality Ben Shapiro labeled the agreement a "disaster." Senator Bill Cassidy, who has long advocated for a hard line against Iran, declared the war and subsequent deal "the worst foreign policy mistake in decades," even invoking Ronald Reagan's legacy. Eriksson notes that Graham, whose expectation of seeing the Iranian regime "forced to its knees" has not materialized, has also expressed skepticism about the deal, though he has since composed himself.

I don't think anyone during World War II asked how much it cost to defeat the Germans and the Japanese.

— Lindsey GrahamLindsey Graham explaining his view on the cost of war to the author.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Svenska Dagbladet in Swedish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.