Hong Kong Fertility Center Mishandles IVF Samples; 8 of 9 Specimens Not from Original Parents

A major medical blunder has rocked Hong Kong's "Hi-Choice Fertility Center," potentially compromising the IVF process for at least two couples. The center sent nine embryo biopsy samples to the Chinese University of Hong Kong's laboratory for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) in May. Shockingly, results revealed that eight of these samples did not match the DNA of the intended parents, with one sample's origin remaining unconfirmed.

“

The situation is extremely serious.

The Hong Kong Society for Reproduction and Assisted Reproduction Technology described the situation as extremely serious and has ordered the center to suspend 14 of its medical services effective immediately. Hi-Choice Fertility Center issued a statement acknowledging the incident, explaining that the samples were for "preimplantation embryo cell biopsy chromosome examination" for couples undergoing IVF and PGT. They stated that subsequent re-testing of all PGT cases since January 2026 showed no abnormalities, and there is currently no evidence that any embryos were mixed up or implanted incorrectly.

“

The case is suspected to involve human and criminal factors.

However, the Society for Reproduction and Assisted Reproduction Technology indicated that the case might involve human error and criminal elements, prompting the Department of Health to report the matter to the police for investigation. The center is also accused of failing to report the "critical incident of misidentification of patient samples" within the legally mandated 24 hours, a violation of the "Code of Practice for Day Procedure Centres." The center has been ordered to submit an investigation report within four weeks, cease accepting new fertility cases, and proactively contact affected individuals to offer free follow-up testing and assistance.

“

The incident involves a critical risk event of misidentifying patient samples.

Lawmaker Elizabeth Quat, who underwent artificial insemination herself, expressed immediate concern, even checking if her own children were biologically hers. She believes the incident could severely damage public confidence in assisted reproduction and called for stricter double-checking mechanisms to prevent future occurrences. The investigation is ongoing to determine whether the error occurred during sample transport or the testing phase.

“

This incident may impact public confidence in artificial insemination.