Hsinchu City Council Rejects Debate on Troubled Cycling Velodrome Project
Translated from Chinese, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Taiwan's opposition Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) proposed changing the agenda in the Hsinchu City Council to discuss the controversial cycling velodrome renovation project.
- The proposal was rejected by a vote from the ruling Kuomintang (KMT) and Taiwan People's Party (TPP) councilors, who the DPP accused of protecting the city government.
- The DPP highlighted significant engineering flaws in the NT$118 million (approx. $3.6 million USD) project, including flooding and structural damage, despite it being accepted six months prior.
A proposal by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus to alter the Hsinchu City Council's agenda to include a special report on the troubled cycling velodrome renovation project was narrowly defeated by a vote from the ruling Kuomintang (KMT) and Taiwan People's Party (TPP) councilors.
The DPP caucus had sought to bring the issue to the floor for discussion, citing numerous engineering defects in the NT$118 million (approximately $3.6 million USD) project. They argued that the velodrome, which has been accepted for six months, suffers from recurrent flooding and significant structural damage, including landslides and track deterioration following heavy rainfall. The party questioned why the city government, led by Mayor Kao Hung-an, was hesitant to address these issues and accused KMT and TPP councilors of shielding the administration.
Despite the agenda change being blocked, the DPP's proposal to establish a special supervisory committee to inspect and improve the velodrome gained traction. Seven councilors were selected to serve on this committee, tasked with overseeing the necessary rectifications. The DPP caucus expressed strong criticism regarding the project's quality, describing it as a "nightmare" with continuous flaws, including debris accumulation on the service road and severe leaks in the indoor facilities and spectator stands.
The party demanded a special report from the city government, raising concerns about potential mismanagement or corruption given that such significant defects were overlooked during the acceptance process. The vote on the agenda change saw 11 votes against the DPP's 9, effectively blocking a formal council debate on the velodrome's condition. However, the formation of the supervisory committee indicates a continued focus on addressing the project's shortcomings.
Originally published by Liberty Times in Chinese. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.