DistantNews
Support us

Implementation stands between Africa and its critical minerals opportunity

From Daily Maverick · () English

Summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.

At a glance

Analysis Named sources Context piece
  • The African Critical Minerals Summit in Johannesburg highlighted opportunities in copper, cobalt, graphite and nickel.
  • Investors need more than well-written mining codes: they also require enforceable rules, reliable institutions, infrastructure and predictable licensing processes.
  • The article argues that only governments can provide the sustained political will needed for regulatory certainty, the foundation for turning mineral resources into bankable projects.

Africa’s critical minerals opportunity will not be decided by the quality of its policy documents alone. The real test is whether governments can turn those documents into functioning institutions, enforceable rules, accessible infrastructure and predictable processes.

That point emerged at the African Critical Minerals Summit 2026 in Johannesburg, where industry leaders and legal experts discussed the prospects for copper, cobalt, graphite and nickel. A government can write an impressive mining code and still fail to attract capital. If a licence takes three years to obtain, the code does not provide meaningful regulatory certainty. Projects, the article argues, stall more often because of process than geology.

Across several African jurisdictions, three factors repeatedly determine whether a mineral opportunity becomes a bankable project: regulatory certainty, reliable geological data and infrastructure. Their relationship is not equal. When clear rules and good data exist, investors may fund infrastructure themselves, or dedicated infrastructure investment may follow. When rules and infrastructure are in place, exploration capital is more likely to arrive because companies trust that geological information can eventually support a viable project.

But nothing can replace regulatory certainty. Even strong data and infrastructure will not unlock investment if governments do not consistently and visibly create transparent, enforceable rules. Private capital, donors and international organisations cannot make that political decision for the state.

The article also challenges the idea of critical minerals as a standalone industry. Lithium, cobalt and manganese underpin the energy transition. Nickel, graphite and rare earths support electric vehicles, while copper is essential to digital infrastructure. Defence and aerospace rely on platinum-group metals and titanium, and agriculture increasingly depends on phosphates and potash. Seen in that way, the policy question is not simply how to develop mining, but how to build the foundation for many other sectors while ensuring communities benefit.

About this summary

Originally published by Daily Maverick. Summarized and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.