Insights on Federal High Court (pre-election) practice directions (amendment), 2026

Nigeria's Federal High Court has introduced new rules to streamline pre-election litigation, aiming to ensure disputes are resolved before the general elections scheduled for January 16, 2027. The amended Federal High Court (Pre-Election) Practice Directions, effective July 14, 2026, address the critical need for timely resolution of cases concerning nominations, disqualifications, and primary election conduct.

“

Its arrival, roughly six months before the general elections scheduled for 16 January 2027, is deliberate rather than incidental: it is the judiciary’s procedural answer to a legislative and constitutional framework that leaves very little room for delay.

The amendments are a procedural response to a legal framework that, while mandating swift resolution, can be prone to delays. Nigerian election law requires pre-election suits to be filed within 14 days of an event and judgments to be delivered within 180 days. The new directions seek to close procedural gaps, particularly given the tight timelines for candidate list submissions and the prohibition of court injunctions halting electoral processes.

A key innovation is the provision for court registries to remain open on Saturdays, Sundays, and public holidays between 10 a.m. and 2 p.m. specifically for filing pre-election matters. This ensures that the constitutional right of access to courts is practical, especially when the 14-day filing window might otherwise expire over a weekend.

“

Given the 14-day filing window under Section 285(9), a rule that closed the registry over a weekend could, in practice, extinguish a litigant’s cause of action. Opening the registry converts a constitutional right of access into a practical one.

Furthermore, the amendment retains originating summons as the primary method for pre-election suits but introduces a safeguard for cases involving contested facts. Where parties allege fraud, forgery, or other contentious issues, they must now file written depositions in addition to affidavits. These depositions are subject to cross-examination, a sensible measure to address the limitations of the originating summons procedure when dealing with disputed evidence.

“

This is a sensible concession to the reality that originating summons procedure, built for undisputed facts