DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Singapore /Conflict & Security

Iran's Supreme Leader Orders Enriched Uranium to Stay in Country

From The Straits Times · () English

Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Context piece
  • Iran's Supreme Leader has directed that the country's near-weapons-grade uranium should not be exported.
  • This directive hardens Tehran's stance amid ongoing peace talks with the U.S. and its allies.
  • The decision is reportedly driven by concerns that exporting the uranium would leave Iran more vulnerable to potential attacks by the U.S. and Israel.

Tehran has solidified its position on its nuclear program, with Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei, issuing a directive that the nation's stockpile of enriched uranium must remain within the country. This significant decision, confirmed by senior Iranian sources, directly challenges a key demand from the United States in the ongoing peace negotiations. The move signals a hardening of Iran's stance and could complicate efforts to resolve the conflict, particularly concerning the U.S.-Israeli pressure on Iran.

Israeli officials have previously stated that President Donald Trump assured them of Iran's commitment to exporting its enriched uranium stockpile as part of any peace deal. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has also made the removal of this uranium, along with Iran's support for proxy militias and its ballistic missile capabilities, prerequisites for ending the war. However, the Supreme Leader's directive, reflecting a consensus within the Iranian establishment, prioritizes national security. The sources indicate that sending the enriched uranium abroad is perceived as increasing Iran's vulnerability to future military actions by the U.S. and Israel.

The Supreme Leaderโ€™s directive, and the consensus within the establishment, is that the stockpile of enriched uranium should not leave the country.

โ€” Senior Iranian sourceConfirming the Supreme Leader's order regarding the enriched uranium.

The backdrop to this development is a fragile ceasefire that began after U.S.-Israeli strikes in late February, followed by retaliatory actions from Iran and heightened tensions, including clashes between Israel and Hezbollah. Peace talks, mediated by Pakistan, have been hampered by a U.S. blockade of Iranian ports and Iran's control over the Strait of Hormuz. Adding to the complexity, there is deep suspicion within Iran that the current lull in hostilities is a strategic maneuver by Washington, designed to create a false sense of security before potentially renewing airstrikes. Iran's chief peace negotiator has voiced concerns about "obvious and hidden moves by the enemy," suggesting preparations for new attacks.

From Iran's perspective, this directive underscores our unwavering commitment to national sovereignty and security. While Western media may frame this as an obstruction to peace talks or a sign of defiance, for us, it is a crucial step in safeguarding our nation. The enriched uranium is seen not just as a bargaining chip, but as a deterrent and a vital component of our defense strategy. The deep suspicion towards U.S. intentions, fueled by past actions and current rhetoric, means that any agreement must provide credible guarantees against further aggression. Our priority remains securing a permanent end to the war and ensuring our security, and the retention of our nuclear materials is central to that objective.

The U.S. was ready to proceed with further attacks on Tehran if Iran did not agree to a peace deal, but suggested Washington could wait a few days to 'get the right answers.'

โ€” Donald TrumpStating the U.S. position on potential further attacks if a peace deal is not reached.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by The Straits Times in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.