Iran-US talks deepened understanding but mistrust remains, parliament speaker Ghalibaf says

The recent negotiations between Iran and the United States, as detailed by Parliament Speaker Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf, represent a complex step forward, marked by increased mutual understanding yet persistent mistrust. Ghalibaf's assertion that Iran has 'won' a conflict, despite acknowledging the US's superior military resources, highlights a narrative of national resilience and strategic ingenuity. This perspective, shared through Iranian television, frames Iran's actions not merely as a defense but as a successful assertion of its sovereignty and preparedness against external threats.

“

We have always sought normalization of traffic in the Strait of Hormuz, and we still do. If it was stopped now, it was because the ceasefire had not been fully established in Lebanon.

The focus on the Strait of Hormuz underscores its critical importance to Iran's national interests and regional influence. Ghalibaf's insistence on normalization of traffic, contingent on broader regional stability like a ceasefire in Lebanon, positions Iran as a key player in maintaining maritime security. The claim that Iran's ships must be able to pass if others can, and the assertion of victory when the US and NATO allegedly failed to achieve their objectives, reflects a strong nationalistic stance.

“

It is impossible that others would be allowed to pass through the Strait of Hormuz while Iranian ships could not.

Furthermore, the inclusion of Lebanon and Hezbollah in ceasefire discussions, framed as the 'resistance front' aiding the Islamic Republic, demonstrates Iran's commitment to its regional allies and its broader geopolitical strategy. This narrative of solidarity and mutual defense is a cornerstone of Iran's foreign policy, often presented in stark contrast to what is perceived as Western-led unilateralism. The emphasis on 'design and preparedness' over sheer equipment highlights a national pride in strategic thinking and the ability to overcome material disadvantages, a narrative that resonates deeply within the country.

“

They wanted to attack under the pretext of opening the Strait of Hormuz, but NATO and others did not help them. In this scene, by their own admission and the world public opinion, we are victorious.