Israel election panel allows parties to track voters in real time ahead of High Court review
Translated from English and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.
At a glance
- Israel’s Central Elections Committee voted 19-11, with three abstentions, to let party representatives report in real time which voters have cast ballots ahead of the October 27 election.
- The information does not reveal vote choices, but campaigns can use it to target supporters who have not yet voted with calls, messages, visits and transportation.
- The High Court of Justice will resume reviewing the privacy and election-law dispute on Wednesday.
Israel’s Central Elections Committee has restored, for now, a key part of political parties’ Election Day operations: knowing in real time which individual voters have cast ballots.
The information does not show how anyone voted. It tells parties only whether a particular person has voted, allowing campaigns to compare the data with their voter databases and focus calls, messages, home visits and transportation on likely supporters who have not yet reached the polls.
The committee approved the Likud-backed proposal on Sunday by 19 votes to 11, with three abstentions. The decision departed from the position of committee chairman and Supreme Court Deputy President Noam Sohlberg, who ruled in August that transferring identified voter information to political parties was prohibited.
The committee imposed several limits. Parties may not receive information from special polling stations, record the time an individual voted, transfer the data to another party or outside body, or use it for purposes other than encouraging turnout. The information must also be destroyed after the election.
The decision does not settle the legal dispute. The High Court will resume hearing Likud’s petition at 8 a.m. on Wednesday, after the parties update it on the committee’s action. The court has not ruled that Sohlberg lacked authority to impose the original ban. Instead, an arrangement approved last Thursday sent the underlying issue to the full committee for a fresh decision, with Sohlberg’s rulings presented as his legal opinion. The next hearing is therefore expected to focus on whether the committee’s decision complies with privacy and election law.
Originally published by Jerusalem Post in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.