Israel recognizing Armenian Genocide doesn't go far enough – they must protect Armenians - opinion

Israel's recent recognition of the Armenian Genocide has sparked a global debate, with some questioning the nation's moral standing given accusations of its own actions in Gaza. However, the author contends that such recognition is primarily driven by geopolitical interests rather than pure morality.

States, the argument goes, do not acknowledge genocides out of newfound conscience but when it aligns with their political, strategic, or domestic agendas. International relations are characterized by realpolitik, where morality often takes a backseat to national interests, a dynamic that has historically allowed genocides to occur or be ignored.

The author credits the Armenian National Committee of Jerusalem, alongside Israeli scholars and organizations, for sustaining the campaign for recognition. Despite this, the article highlights that the Israeli government should accompany its acknowledgment with tangible measures to safeguard the Armenian community in East Jerusalem. This community faces ongoing discrimination and harassment from ultra-nationalist Jewish groups, including verbal abuse and desecration of sacred sites, creating an existential threat.

"Recognition without meaningful measures to protect a vulnerable minority is little more than ink on paper," the article states, emphasizing that this pattern has been observed in many instances of genocide acknowledgment. The author concludes that without concrete protection, Israel's recognition risks becoming a symbolic gesture rather than a substantive commitment to preventing future atrocities.

“

Recognition without meaningful measures to protect a vulnerable minority is little more than ink on paper.