DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ง Lebanon /Conflict & Security

Israel risks new quagmire in Lebanon with Beaufort fortress capture

From Naharnet · () English

Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Ongoing story
  • Israel captured the Crusader-era Beaufort fortress in Lebanon, portraying it as a turning point against Hezbollah.
  • The operation has raised fears of a new quagmire, as the fortress symbolizes a costly past entanglement for many Israelis.
  • Despite the capture, analysts and former officials express skepticism about its strategic significance, questioning if it signifies a learning from past mistakes.

Israel has framed the capture of the Crusader-era Beaufort fortress in south Lebanon as a significant turning point in its ongoing offensive against Hezbollah. Military drones documented the assault on the fortress, perched atop a rocky outcrop overlooking a valley, with authorities rapidly distributing footage of troops entering the historic site.

The recapture of Beaufort holds symbolic weight for Israel, echoing a famous 1982 image of then-defense minister Ariel Sharon and prime minister Menahem Begin at the same location. However, for many Israelis, the fortress remains a potent symbol not of victory, but of a protracted and costly military entanglement that ultimately failed to dislodge Hezbollah. "The conquest of Beaufort is the most blatant sign that we haven't learned a thing," stated Nadav Pollak, a professor at Reichman University and former Israeli intelligence officer, decrying the operation as a "stupid PR photo-op."

The conquest of Beaufort is the most blatant sign that we haven't learned a thing.

โ€” Nadav PollakProfessor at Reichman University and former Israeli intelligence officer, commenting on the capture of the fortress.

Israeli forces occupied southern Lebanon for two decades, during which over 1,200 soldiers were killed and thousands more wounded before their withdrawal in 2000. The military, now engaged in its deepest incursion into Lebanon since that withdrawal, argues the site possesses genuine strategic value, citing Hezbollah's launch of 400 projectiles toward Israel from the area since early March.

stupid PR photo-op

โ€” Nadav PollakDescribing the operation and calling Beaufort a symbol of past strategic errors.

Avigdor Kahalani, who commanded the 1982 assault on Beaufort against Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) fighters, expressed satisfaction at seeing the Israeli flag fly over the fortress again. However, he viewed the operation primarily as a symbolic milestone and a stepping stone northward, rather than a decisive turning point. "I will be excited the moment they will destroy Hezbollah," Kahalani, a former minister of internal security, told AFP.

Despite Lebanese authorities reporting Hezbollah's acceptance of a U.S. proposal for a mutual cessation of attacks, and President Donald Trump's hopes for an "eternity" of peace, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu remains committed to operations in southern Lebanon. The military aims to establish a security zone up to the Litani River, approximately 30 kilometers from the Israeli border. Yet, Sarit Zehavi, a reserve lieutenant-colonel, noted that most Israelis show little appetite for a return to Lebanon, recalling a childhood atmosphere where daily news often began with reports from the conflict zone.

I will be excited the moment they will destroy Hezbollah.

โ€” Avigdor KahalaniFormer minister of internal security, commenting on the strategic significance of the Beaufort operation.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Naharnet in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.