Israel’s ministerial bloat is starting to look like the Soviet Union - opinion
Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Israel's government is criticized for excessive ministerial bloat, with nearly a third of the Knesset serving as ministers, resembling Soviet-era bureaucracy.
- Many of Israel's roughly 30 ministries are described as "made-up portfolios" created for political patronage, leading to inefficiency and gridlock.
- Streamlining the government could save approximately NIS 950 million annually, with significant budget losses and delays documented due to administrative transfers.
Israel's current governmental structure is drawing criticism for its excessive ministerial bloat, drawing parallels to the bureaucratic excesses of the Soviet Union. With approximately 30 active ministries and a peak headcount of 38 ministers, nearly a third of the 120-member Knesset simultaneously holds executive positions. This ratio is significantly higher than in many European governments.
Because Israel currently operates with roughly 30 active ministries and a peak headcount of 38 ministers, nearly a third of Israel’s parliament has simultaneously served in the executive branch.
The article argues that many of these ministries are "made-up portfolios" established for political patronage rather than genuine governmental need, leading to a 100% decrease in efficiency. The constant shuffling of government units across ministries, with 76 structural changes executed in just four and a half years, causes administrative gridlock. Basic communication becomes impossible as departments are moved, with transfers taking anywhere from three weeks to two and a half years.
roughly 50% of Israel’s ministries are entirely made-up portfolios created solely for political patronage.
The financial implications of this bloated bureaucracy are substantial. The Finance Ministry estimates that streamlining the government down to 24 ministries and merging overlapping departments could save around NIS 950 million annually. The article cites an example where the transfer of the Agriculture Planning Authority resulted in its entire NIS 40 million budget being lost in bureaucratic friction, requiring additional taxpayer funds to rebuild the department later.
this constant shuffling carries a massive financial and operational price tag.
Beyond financial costs and inefficiency, the creation of overtly political ministries diminishes the importance of their intended missions. The article suggests that a prime minister cannot effectively manage a cabinet exceeding 20 members, leading to further bureaucratic complications and a failure to address core governmental functions efficiently. The comparison to the Soviet Union highlights a perceived descent into bureaucratic absurdity driven by political expediency.
The Finance Ministry estimates that simply streamlining this bloat down to 24 ministries and merging overlapping departments would save roughly NIS 950 million a year.
Originally published by Jerusalem Post. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.