Jewish, Hindu, Zoroastrian parents sue California school district over mosque field trip
Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- A group of parents from diverse religious backgrounds sued the Palo Alto Unified School District and a high school principal over a mosque field trip.
- The lawsuit alleges students were encouraged to wear Islamic attire, received Qurans, and were exposed to advocacy from a CAIR executive director with a history of anti-Jewish statements.
- Plaintiffs claim the district failed to maintain religious neutrality, protect student privacy, and adequately supervise the event, leading to constitutional injuries.
A coalition of Jewish, Hindu, and Zoroastrian parents has filed a lawsuit against the Palo Alto Unified School District and Palo Alto High Principal Brent Kline. The suit, brought by the Community Members for Religious Neutrality in Public Schools, San Francisco Bay Area, alleges that students were pushed to wear Islamic religious attire during a fall 2025 field trip to a mosque.
The district failed to maintain religious neutrality, failed to ensure equal treatment among faiths, failed to protect student privacy and failed to vet, supervise, and monitor religiously divisive outside speakers during the school-sponsored event.
The plaintiffs, including Jewish, Hindu, and Zoroastrian parents, claim the school district failed to uphold religious neutrality and ensure equal treatment among faiths. According to the lawsuit filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, students visiting the Muslim Community Associationโs mosque in Santa Clara were encouraged to wear hijabs and were given Qurans. The suit also states that students engaged with the mosque's youth program and heard from Zahra Billoo, executive director of the San Francisco Bay Area chapter of the Council of American-Islamic Relations.
Billoo was 'allowed unfettered access to students to advocate personal religious and political views without balancing perspective or adequate supervision.'
The lawsuit specifically targets Billoo's involvement, alleging she had "unfettered access to students to advocate personal religious and political views without balancing perspective or adequate supervision." The parents highlighted that Billoo has previously made "hostile and discriminatory statements regarding Jews." They contend that school officials should have known about the risks of religious exposure and the potential for student images to be disseminated in a religious context without proper safeguards.
Billoo has previously made 'hostile and discriminatory statements regarding Jews.'
Furthermore, the parents assert that photos were taken of students during the trip without their explicit parental consent. The suit claims the school facilitated the photography and public dissemination of student images in a religious context, thereby associating students with a particular faith without specific, informed parental authorization. The district's alleged failures, the plaintiffs argue, caused constitutional injuries.
Despite such knowledge, PAUSD failed to adopt and enforce adequate safeguards, thereby causing the constitutional injuries alleged in this Complaint.
Originally published by Jerusalem Post. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.