DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Israel /Conflict & Security

Jewish violence in the West Bank is terrorism - and Israel must admit it - opinion

From Jerusalem Post · () English

Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

Opinion Sources not specified Context piece
  • Jewish settlers in the West Bank are committing acts of violence including torching cars, attacking farmers, and hurling stones at vehicles, which the author argues should be classified as terrorism.
  • The author criticizes the Israeli term

Jewish settlers in the West Bank are engaging in acts of violence that include torching cars, attacking farmers, and hurling stones at vehicles. The author argues these actions should be unequivocally labeled as terrorism, a term they believe Israel is hesitant to apply when Jews are the perpetrators.

On the contrary, we have an obligation to use it. It is โ€œterrorism.โ€

โ€” the authorWhen discussing the violence perpetrated by Jewish settlers in the West Bank.

The article criticizes the Israeli term "Nationalistic crime" as a vague and sanitized phrase that avoids directly confronting the reality of the violence. The author posits that if the roles were reversed, with Palestinians committing similar acts against Israelis, the immediate response would be to label them terrorists. This double standard, the author contends, highlights a reluctance to use the appropriate vocabulary when Jewish individuals are involved.

Terrorism, the piece argues, is defined by the act itself, not the religion or nationality of the perpetrator. When violence is deliberately directed at civilians for ideological or nationalist aims, as seen in the West Bank, it must be called what it is. The author clarifies that this does not imply all settlers are terrorists, distinguishing the violent minority from the vast majority of Israelis living in the West Bank who oppose such actions.

Terrorism is not determined by the religion or nationality of the person who carries it out. It is determined by the act.

โ€” the authorDefining terrorism and arguing for its application to the acts of violence in the West Bank.

The author asserts that Israel has an obligation to use the word "terrorism" to describe these acts, emphasizing that the definition hinges on the nature of the violence and its goals, not the identity of those carrying it out. The piece calls for a clear and consistent application of this definition, regardless of who is perpetrating the violence.

When violence is deliberately directed against civilians in pursuit of an ideological or nationalist goal โ€“ which is the case in the West Bank โ€“ we need to be capable of calling it what it is.

โ€” the authorArguing for the use of the term 'terrorism' to describe specific acts of violence.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Jerusalem Post. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.