DistantNews
Support us
Judges who lose public trust must be removed: Supreme Court
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฐ Pakistan /Crime & Justice

Judges who lose public trust must be removed: Supreme Court

From Dawn · () English

Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Sources not specified Outcome reported
  • The Supreme Court ruled that judges who compromise their integrity and public trust should be removed from service.
  • The court restored the penalty of removal, overturning a tribunal's decision to grant compulsory retirement to a judicial officer.
  • The ruling emphasizes that a judge's credibility is as important as avoiding corruption, as loss of public confidence undermines the entire rule of law.

The Supreme Court of Pakistan has established a stringent standard for judicial integrity, ruling that judges who lose public trust must be removed from their positions. A three-judge bench, headed by Justice Shahid Waheed, emphasized that a judge's conduct can compromise their integrity, undermine the institution's moral authority, and erode public confidence.

The moment public confidence in the integrity of a judicial officer is fractured, the fracture runs through the entire structure of the rule of law, undermining the integrity of the judicial institution itself.

โ€” Justice Shahid WaheedEmphasizing the importance of public trust in the judiciary.

The court's decision restored the penalty of removal from service for a judicial officer, reversing a previous ruling by the Punjab Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal. The tribunal had reduced the penalty from removal to compulsory retirement, citing insufficient evidence of corruption but acknowledging a tarnished reputation.

The robe of a judge was not stained only by proven corruption; it was equally darkened by a sustained loss of credibility.

โ€” Supreme Court benchDescribing the impact of a tarnished reputation on a judge.

Justice Waheed, authoring the judgment, stated that the penalty must be proportionate to the "mischief," which in this case was the loss of public confidence. The court found that the judicial officer had not only lost public confidence by compromising impartiality but had also "strangled his judicial career." The ruling asserts that the continuation of such an officer in office is incompatible with the institution's interests, highlighting that a judge's robe is stained not only by proven corruption but also by a sustained loss of credibility.

The continuation of such a judicial officer in office had become incompatible with the interests of the institution.

โ€” Justice Shahid WaheedExplaining the necessity of removing a judge who has lost public confidence.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Dawn in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.