Judicial Appointment Raises Concerns Over "Shielding" of AFA Officials

A judicial appointment for a vacant position in Argentina's Economic Crimes Court No. 10 has sparked controversy, with sources suggesting it may serve to "shield" Argentine Football Association (AFA) president Claudio “Chiqui” Tapia and treasurer Pablo Toviggino. The court is currently overseeing the "Pilar mansion" case, a significant investigation targeting the AFA officials.

The candidate in question is María Pérez Cárrega, an associate of Judge Alberto Lugones. She has been placed on the final shortlist for the judgeship, a move that has drawn attention within judicial circles. Pérez Cárrega was initially ranked 12th in the merit order after background and written exams, with eight other candidates ahead of her. However, her position significantly improved following personal interviews conducted by the Selection Commission.

Judge Lugones's involvement in advocating for Pérez Cárrega has been noted. Sources indicate that the selection process for this particular court has been unusually protracted and subject to shifts since its opening in 2019. The written exam took place that year, followed by merit order approvals in 2020 and interviews in 2022, with the final proposal only approved in April of the current year.

Currently, Judge Verónica Straccia is temporarily presiding over the court and the "Pilar mansion" case. Upon the appointment of a new judge, Straccia will relinquish her role. The unusual progression of the selection process, particularly the elevation of Pérez Cárrega's ranking after interviews, has generated significant questions regarding its fairness and potential motivations.