Jury Tosses Elon Musk's Lawsuit Against OpenAI and Sam Altman

In a significant legal development, a California jury has thrown out Elon Musk's lawsuit against OpenAI and its CEO, Sam Altman. The verdict, delivered unanimously, hinged on the finding that Musk's claims were brought after the legal time limit had passed. Musk had alleged that Altman betrayed the company's original non-profit mission, which he claimed was to develop AI for the benefit of humanity, by shifting OpenAI to a for-profit model after Musk had donated $38 million.

During the three-week trial, internal communications and testimonies from key figures including Musk, Altman, and Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella were presented. Musk, testifying on the first day, emphasized his view that "it's not OK to steal a charity." However, Altman's testimony presented a different narrative, suggesting Musk not only supported the move to a for-profit structure but also sought long-term control, even proposing that control might pass to his children upon his death.

“

It's actually very simple. It's not OK to steal a charity... If it's okay to loot a charity, the entire foundation of charitable giving will be destroyed.

This ruling is a major setback for Musk's legal challenges against OpenAI. The jury's decision on the statute of limitations effectively sidestepped the core arguments about the company's mission and profit status. The dismissal of Musk's claims against Microsoft, a co-defendant, further solidifies the outcome in favor of OpenAI and Altman. The case originated after Musk's departure from OpenAI in 2018, following disagreements over control of the organization.

“

A particularly hair-raising moment was when my co-founders asked, 'If you have control, what happens when you die?' He said something like, 'maybe it should pass to my children.'