DistantNews
Support us
Kılıçdaroğlu defends stance on immunity after backlash

Kılıçdaroğlu defends stance on immunity after backlash

From Cumhuriyet · () Turkish

Translated from Turkish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Context piece
  • Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu reiterated his stance that he does not find any parliamentary immunity acceptable, except for speech immunity, despite backlash over his "I do not regret it" comment regarding the lifting of Selahattin Demirtaş's immunity.
  • Kılıçdaroğlu explained that the CHP's "yes" vote in 2016 to lift immunities was a strategic move to prevent the ruling party from using it as a propaganda tool and to show that politicians were not afraid of prosecution.
  • He criticized the ruling AK Party for later violating legal processes and universal legal principles by arresting politicians en masse after their immunities were removed.

Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu, leader of Turkey's Republican People's Party (CHP), has reaffirmed his position against parliamentary immunity, stating that he finds no immunity acceptable other than speech immunity. This comes after facing criticism for his comment, "I do not regret it," regarding the lifting of former HDP co-chair Selahattin Demirtaş's parliamentary immunity.

Apart from speech immunity, I do not find any other immunity acceptable.

— Kemal KılıçdaroğluKılıçdaroğlu reiterated his stance on parliamentary immunity.

Kılıçdaroğlu addressed the controversy, explaining the CHP's decision to vote in favor of lifting immunities in 2016. He described it as a strategic move to thwart the ruling AK Party's "perception operation" and political trap. The CHP's aim, he said, was to demonstrate that politicians were not afraid of facing legal consequences and to prevent the country from becoming dangerously polarized. "We took a risk; we prevented this nightmare and the country's dangerous polarization," Kılıçdaroğlu stated, adding that their majority allowed for this action.

We took a risk; we prevented this nightmare and the country's dangerous polarization.

— Kemal KılıçdaroğluHe explained the CHP's rationale behind voting to lift immunities in 2016.

He further criticized the AK Party government, accusing it of later abusing the judiciary as a "stick" and violating legal processes and universal legal principles. Kılıçdaroğlu alleged that politicians were promptly detained and arrested after their immunities were removed, contrary to the expected legal procedure of trial without detention. "The ones who should be blamed are not the opposition, but the Palace regime that murdered the law," he asserted.

The ones who should be blamed are not the opposition, but the Palace regime that murdered the law.

— Kemal KılıçdaroğluKılıçdaroğlu criticized the ruling government's handling of legal processes.

Kılıçdaroğlu also touched upon the situation of Selahattin Demirtaş, who is currently imprisoned. He stated that he and the CHP have consistently voiced opposition to the "unjust and unlawful" imprisonment of Demirtaş and other political prisoners, actively campaigning for the implementation of European Court of Human Rights decisions and Demirtaş's freedom. He implied that some individuals claiming to be Demirtaş's allies are ignoring this struggle and engaging in secret negotiations with the Erdoğan administration.

We have always raised the loudest voice against the unjust, unlawful imprisonment of Mr. Demirtaş and all political prisoners from day one.

— Kemal KılıçdaroğluHe highlighted the CHP's consistent opposition to the imprisonment of political figures.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Cumhuriyet in Turkish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.