Kaohsiung floods spark KMT-DPP clash; candidate accuses rival of 'concept-swapping'

Heavy rains in Kaohsiung have triggered a political spat between the KMT and DPP. KMT mayoral candidate Ko Chih-en visited Meinong to survey flood damage, noting that fields of water shield plants, which require their leaves to float for photosynthesis, were submerged and caused significant losses.

“

Water shield plants grow in water, but their leaves need to float on the surface to breathe and photosynthesize.

Ko criticized perceived political maneuvering that trivialized farmers' suffering. She stated that while the ruling party's cabinet members visited to assess agricultural damage, online operatives mocked the farmers' plight, turning their pain into a tool for political combat.

“

This is a typical example of 'concept-swapping' and 'deflection of the argument' – an invalid defense.

In response, DPP candidate Yin Li countered that the ridicule stemmed from Ko's "ignorance," not a disregard for farmers. Yin argued that Ko's initial statement about the water shield plants being "submerged by floodwaters" was imprecise, as the plants naturally grow in water. Yin accused Ko of "concept-swapping" and diverting the argument by framing the public's questioning of her agricultural knowledge as an attack on farmers.

“

The ridicule is about Ko Chih-en's 'ignorance,' but she is using 'farmers' as a shield.

Yin elaborated that if the core issue was mud and prolonged submersion causing rot, Ko should have focused on those factors. Instead, Yin asserted, Ko twisted the narrative to suggest critics believed water shield plants were immune to flood damage, thereby ignoring the actual losses. Yin concluded that Ko's tactic of using affected farmers as a shield to evade personal responsibility was a flawed argument, equating a question about personal knowledge to a moral persecution of a group.

“

The core issue of the disaster should be mud and prolonged immersion causing rot, not simply being 'submerged by floodwaters'.