Karnataka Upa Lokayukta probes 54 officials over Hampi homestay violations

Karnataka's Upa Lokayukta has launched suo motu proceedings against 54 officials for their alleged failure to stop unauthorized homestays and commercial activities within the protected zones of Hampi. This action follows an inspection that uncovered hundreds of tourism establishments operating without necessary permissions.

Justice B. Veerappa initiated the proceedings after receiving complaints about commercial activity in Hampi's Core, Buffer, and Peripheral zones. During a July 25 inspection, officials reported that approximately 250 homestays were functioning without mandatory licenses from the Gram Panchayats or the Hampi World Heritage Area Management Authority (HWHAMA). The officials facing scrutiny include those from the Hampi Authority, Sub-Divisional Officers, Tahsildars, Taluk Panchayat Executive Officers, and Panchayat Development Officers in Hosapete and Koppal.

Justice Veerappa emphasized the gravity of these violations, noting that they contravene restrictions governing the protected heritage area. He stated that the Supreme Court has explicitly forbidden unauthorized commercial activities in Hampi's Core Zone. The presence of illegal establishments during his inspection, he remarked, constitutes not only an administrative failure but also a breach of a Supreme Court directive and India's commitment to UNESCO.

“

The Supreme Court has clearly directed that no unauthorized commercial activities should be allowed in Hampi’s highly protected Core Zone. However, during my inspection, I found several such illegal establishments operating.

Under regulations for Hampi's protected areas, unauthorized commercial construction, resorts, and homestays are prohibited in the Core and Buffer zones. All activities within the heritage area must adhere to HWHAMA's regulations. The Upa Lokayukta is now seeking records related to permissions granted for commercial establishments, aiming to understand how these units were established, whether approvals were issued, and which authorities were responsible for oversight.

Officials have been asked to explain the lack of action against these unauthorized units, how they secured electricity connections, and why local panchayats did not intervene to prevent construction. The HWHAMA's role in enforcing restrictions is also under examination. Vijayanagara Deputy Commissioner Kavitha S. Mannikeri confirmed the suo motu complaint and stated that discussions are underway with relevant departments. She clarified that no permissions were granted for construction in restricted areas and assured that appropriate action would be taken.

“

Detailed information is being collected from the concerned authorities and appropriate action will be taken in accordance with government rules and regulations.