KFOR withdraws from Mitrovica bridge amid security concerns
Translated from Serbian, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- KFOR is gradually withdrawing its permanent presence from a bridge in Mitrovica, citing an improved security situation in Kosovo.
- This move follows a series of incidents, including the demolition of Serb weekend homes and alleged police mistreatment, raising concerns among local Serbs.
- The withdrawal is seen by some as a prelude to opening the bridge to traffic, transferring security responsibilities to the Kosovo Police, despite existing mistrust.
KFOR is scaling back its permanent presence at the bridge in Mitrovica, a move it attributes to an "improved security situation" in Kosovo. The international military mission, led by NATO, has begun a gradual withdrawal of troops from the bridge, which separates northern and southern Mitrovica and has historically been a flashpoint for ethnic tensions.
KFOR stated it would maintain a strong presence in northern Kosovo and could return troops to the streets if necessary. However, the decision has sparked apprehension among local Serbs, particularly following recent incidents. These include the demolition of 17 weekend homes belonging to Serbs in Zubin Potok, which authorities claim were illegally built on company land, and an accusation by a local villager of physical abuse by Kosovo Police during a search.
Despite KFOR's assurances, the withdrawal has not surprised observers like Zoran Saviฤ of the NGO Aktiv in North Mitrovica. He notes that mistrust between the local Serb population and the Kosovo Police remains high, exacerbated by recent events. The Kosovo Police are expected to gradually assume security responsibilities for the bridge, a transition that could lead to its reopening for traffic. This development is viewed with caution by many in the Serb community, who fear further instability.
Originally published by N1 Serbia in Serbian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.