Lebanon, Hezbollah Accuse Israel of Violating Ceasefire Hours After It Took Effect

The fragile 10-day ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon, announced by US President Donald Trump, has been marred by accusations of violations just hours after its midnight commencement. From Beirut's perspective, the Lebanese army and Hezbollah have accused Israel of aggression and bombardments, with Hezbollah stating it targeted Israeli soldiers in response to the 'violation of the ceasefire by the occupation army.' This immediate eruption of hostilities underscores the deep-seated mistrust and the volatile nature of the conflict, despite international calls for peace.

“

Lebanon and Hezbollah accuse Israel of violating the ceasefire.

Hezbollah's stance, as reported, is that 'Israeli occupation on our land grants Lebanon and its people the right to resist it.' This framing positions any Israeli military action within Lebanese territory as a continuation of occupation, thereby justifying resistance. The group's statement that this right 'will be determined based on how developments unfold' suggests a conditional adherence to the ceasefire, contingent on Israel's actions. This highlights the complex dynamic where Hezbollah, not formally part of the state agreement, reserves its right to respond to perceived Israeli provocations.

“

The Lebanese army accused Israel of committing 'acts of aggression' and bombardments.

While the international community, including UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, has called for full respect of the truce, the events of the first few hours paint a grim picture. The reports of continued Israeli shelling in southern Lebanese villages shortly after the ceasefire went into effect, even as Israel's military stated it was investigating, add to the tension. For Lebanon and its people, the hope for respite is immediately challenged by the reality of ongoing conflict, making the sustainability of this ceasefire highly uncertain.

“

The Hezbollah movement announced that it had targeted Israeli soldiers in the south of the country, stating it was acting 'in response to the violation of the ceasefire by the occupation army.'