DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea /Culture & Society

Lee Byung-tae: Defending freedom of expression, not mocking Gwangju Uprising

From Hankyoreh · () Korean

Translated from Korean, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Context piece
  • A South Korean presidential committee official defended his remarks on the 1980 Gwangju Uprising, stating freedom of expression does not mean freedom from responsibility.
  • Lee Byung-tae previously suggested the Gwangju Uprising had become a "sacred cow" and compared disciplinary action against a high school baseball team to North Korea.
  • He argued that responding to offensive language should not involve regulation and punishment, but rather fostering resilience against hurtful words.

Lee Byung-tae, deputy chairman of South Korea's Presidential Committee on Regulatory Reform, has defended his controversial remarks regarding the 1980 Gwangju Uprising, asserting that freedom of expression does not equate to freedom from responsibility. His comments follow calls for his resignation from within the ruling party.

Freedom of expression does not mean freedom from responsibility.

โ€” Lee Byung-taeDeputy Chairman of the Presidential Committee on Regulatory Reform, defending his stance on controversial remarks.

Lee had previously stated on Facebook that the Gwangju Uprising had become a "sacred cow" and likened the disciplinary action against the Paichai High School baseball team, which used a song allegedly mocking the event, to North Korea's system. He later clarified his position, emphasizing that "the responsibility for reflection is not in the realm of legal punishment, but social condemnation."

He argued that the appropriate response to offensive language is not through regulatory or punitive measures. "We must learn consideration for others as we live, but we must also cultivate a core that is not hurt by others' words," Lee stated. He believes that while freedom of expression should be defended, it must be balanced with the need for societal consideration and individual resilience.

The responsibility for reflection is not in the realm of legal punishment, but social condemnation.

โ€” Lee Byung-taeExplaining his view on how society should address offensive speech.

Lee's initial remarks drew criticism for trivializing the Gwangju Uprising, a pivotal event in South Korea's democratization movement. His subsequent defense, however, attempts to reframe the debate around the boundaries of free speech, distinguishing between universally accepted ideas and targeted insults, and emphasizing that legal repercussions should be reserved for actions, not mere expressions, unless they incite imminent lawless action.

We must learn consideration for others as we live, but we must also cultivate a core that is not hurt by others' words.

โ€” Lee Byung-taeAdvocating for a balance between free speech and personal resilience.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Hankyoreh in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.