Legacy parties can no longer ignore the need for reform
Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Nepal's major communist parties, CPN-UML and the Nepali Communist Party, are delaying decisions on ministerial portfolios despite forming an alliance for provincial governments.
- Internal conflicts persist within the Nepali Congress, with party chair Sher Bahadur Deuba reportedly resisting changes and hindering leadership recognition for figures like Gagan Thapa.
- The article criticizes these legacy parties for their focus on power struggles over public good, warning that their failure to reform and address public frustration could lead to further electoral decline.
Nepal's dominant communist parties, the CPN-UML and the Nepali Communist Party, are facing internal disagreements over the distribution of ministerial portfolios in provincial governments, even after agreeing to form an alliance. The parties are reportedly considering splitting ministries in Koshi Province to increase the available positions, a move that comes as CPN-UML chair KP Sharma Oli allegedly seeks to install a loyalist as chief minister by ousting Hikmat Karki from his own party.
Meanwhile, the Nepali Congress is embroiled in a protracted internal conflict that predates recent political upheavals. Neither faction appears willing to compromise, suggesting a primary motive of retaining power. A major point of contention is Sher Bahadur Deuba's alleged refusal to invalidate the January convention and recognize Gagan Thapa's leadership. While Thapa, as a party commander, is responsible for fostering compromise, his leadership skills are being tested by the escalating internal dispute, which weakens the party and frustrates the public.
The article argues that these internal battles are largely driven by ego and power, with little regard for the broader public good. If the established parties do not change their ways, they risk further losing ground in future elections. The recent alliance between the UML and the NCP may be an attempt to improve their electoral performance, but their current modus operandi is unlikely to achieve this.
The persistent infighting within the Nepali Congress and the bargaining over provincial governments by the communist parties indicate a failure to learn from past political events, including the youth protests. Party leaders seem primarily focused on maintaining power within their parties and governments, showing little concern for effectively serving the public. Despite holding power at provincial and local levels, their working style has remained unchanged, demonstrating a lack of adaptation despite being marginalized in national politics.
Originally published by Kathmandu Post. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.