“Let’s focus on real problems”: Viera-Gallo downplays Magallanes dispute
Translated from Spanish and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.
At a glance
- José Antonio Viera-Gallo described the final resolution of the Chile-Argentina dispute over the Strait of Magellan as sufficient and positive.
- He said a joint statement reaffirmed Chile’s sovereignty in the area under the countries’ 1881 and 1984 treaties.
- Viera-Gallo opposed convening Chile’s National Security Council, saying the controversy had raised temperatures more in Chile than in Argentina.
Former Chilean ambassador to Argentina José Antonio Viera-Gallo urged Chile to focus on “real problems” as he played down the recent dispute with Argentina over sovereignty in the Strait of Magellan.
Let’s focus on real problems.
Speaking to Cooperativa, Viera-Gallo said the controversy had ended with a joint official statement that reaffirmed Chilean control of the area. He described the outcome as “sufficient” and “positive.”
The statement followed the framework established by the 1881 Boundary Treaty and the 1984 Treaty of Peace and Friendship, both signed by Chile and Argentina. Viera-Gallo said the final wording resolved the issue.
Sufficient
He also rejected the idea that Chile needed to convene its National Security Council, known as Cosena. The former diplomat argued that repeatedly assessing every statement from Argentina and calling the council, while former navy admirals urged a pause in cooperation, would reflect a rise in tension inside Chile more than developments in Argentina.
Positive
“It's much more how the temperature has risen in Chile than what has happened in Argentina,” he said.
It is much more how the temperature has risen in Chile than what has happened in Argentina.
Originally published by Cooperativa in Spanish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.