Let's Get Down to Business: 'They Keep Reinstating People Who Collect Pay and Don't Show Up for Work at La Aurora Airport'

Prensa Libre addresses a persistent issue plaguing Guatemala's main air gateway, La Aurora International Airport (AILA): the reinstatement of personnel who, according to transport officials, do not actually work. Vice Minister of Transport Fernando Suriano highlighted this challenge in a recent interview, noting that judicial decisions continue to force the airport to re-employ individuals who are not fulfilling their duties. This situation not only strains resources but also undermines operational efficiency, creating a bureaucratic hurdle that impedes the airport's progress.

Despite these personnel issues, AILA is slated for substantial upgrades. Plans are in motion for investments totaling around Q1.1 billion over the next three years. These funds are earmarked for critical infrastructure improvements, including the acquisition of specialized equipment, new boarding bridges, and the renovation of operational systems. The goal is to enhance the airport's capacity and service quality, bringing it closer to international standards. However, the success of these investments is intrinsically linked to resolving the ongoing personnel and public space recovery challenges.

“

They continue to reinstate people who collect a salary and do not come to work, who have never come to work.

Crucially, the Ministry of Transport is advocating for a legal reform that would bifurcate the airport's regulatory and operational responsibilities. The current model, where the entity that sets standards also manages operations, is seen as a conflict of interest and a barrier to effective oversight. By separating these functions, Guatemala aims to strengthen institutional frameworks and ensure that AILA meets global benchmarks for safety and efficiency. This reform, alongside the infrastructure investments, represents a concerted effort to transform AILA into a modern, functional, and internationally competitive airport, despite the internal challenges it faces.

“

The model seeks that the entity responsible for establishing norms and certifying airports be different from the one that manages the terminals.