DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Israel /Elections & Politics

Let voters have a say in who they vote in to Knesset - opinion

From Jerusalem Post · () English

Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

Opinion Sources not specified Context piece
  • Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is considering canceling Likud party primaries for the upcoming elections, potentially replacing them with a selection committee.
  • This move faces opposition from within the Likud, as incumbent politicians fear losing their positions due to a limited number of realistic slots on the candidate list.
  • The internal struggle highlights the tension between leader-appointed lists and member-elected primaries, each with its own democratic flaws.

The Likud party is embroiled in a significant internal struggle over how its candidate list for the upcoming elections will be determined. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has reportedly considered canceling the democratic primaries in favor of a "selection committee," a move widely seen as a way for him to exert decisive control.

It is possible that this was no more than mutual arm-twisting intended to lead to the expected compromise, under which most of the list will be determined through primaries, while Netanyahu is allocated a large number of personal reserved slots.

โ€” Ofer KenigThe author speculates on a potential compromise in the Likud's internal struggle over candidate selection.

This initiative has met firm opposition from within the party. Incumbent politicians, numbering over 40 Knesset members and ministers, along with returning candidates and former politicians, face a highly competitive environment for a reduced number of viable spots on the list. Each reserved slot granted to Netanyahu would further diminish opportunities for these incumbents, fueling intense unrest.

The conflict also exposes a fundamental tension in Israeli politics regarding candidate selection. One model favors the party leader personally determining the list, which can lead to excessive loyalty and a lack of independent thought among Knesset members. The alternative, inclusive primaries, while democratic in potential, can reward populist behavior and prioritize the interests of a specific party base over diligent parliamentary work. Furthermore, primaries can be susceptible to organized bloc voting by groups with narrow interests.

The leader-based method is far from transparent and may produce submissive Knesset members who display excessive loyalty to the leader, at times at the expense of their conscience and personal views.

โ€” Ofer KenigThe author explains the drawbacks of the leader-based candidate selection method.

Both systems, and any compromise between them, present significant challenges. The leader-based method lacks transparency, while primaries can distort parliamentary focus. The ongoing debate within the Likud reflects these deep-seated issues, raising questions about the future of democratic processes within Israeli political parties.

Primaries, by contrast, despite their democratic potential, tend to produce Knesset members whose political fate is subordinated to a โ€œbaseโ€ of party members that rewards populist conduct at the expense of diligent parliamentary work.

โ€” Ofer KenigThe author outlines the disadvantages of using primaries for candidate selection.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Jerusalem Post. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.